76 people beat the Raptors at 104-101 plus today.
In overtime, Harris’s life scored three points in the bottom corner. When he landed, he was knocked over by Barnes. The referee first fined three plus one, but Raptors coach Nas asked to challenge Barnes for this foul, and the referee went to watch the video.
After watching the video, the referee changed the judgment of Tucker to be a foul first, so this round was a 76-man offensive foul. Before the goal, Harris’s goal was canceled and the ball right was given to the Raptors.
Related News>> Harris blew into the three points, but Tucker stumbled before Harris three points were canceled!
——
Many bar friends asked: why can the referee change the verdict to Tucker’s foul?
——
This rule has been popular once before Ke Dai’s watch: NBA’s challenge rules indicate that when a team asks for a challenge with “reason 1”, when the referee watches the video, it is necessary to see whether “reason 1” is correct. At the same time, the referee can also see “reason 2”, “reason 3”, “Reason 4”, “Reason ABCD” and other situations that may lead to revision.
——
Specifically, in today’s case, according to the original NBA rules, Section III a(2) clause, the referee can not only look at Barnes’s foul, but also look at “near the foul played by whistle, whether there is a foul that should be blown but not blown” (the yellow line field in the following figure).
Before Barnes fouled, the referee found that Tucker had a stumbling foul. Therefore, the referee revised the judgment on this reason, which was in line with NBA rules.
Details of basketball rules